Finally, a little justice for the family of Steven Washington.
photo: Barbara Davidson / Los Angeles Times
We now know the names of the Law Enforcemenet Officers involved in Zac's shooting. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Deputy Mark Brewster and Drug Enforcement Agent Peter LoPresti simultaneously fired six rounds at Zac with their service weapons, resulting in Zac's death. LAPD Officer Joseph Chavez was also involved.
These officers were part of an undercover narcotics operation including the United States Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), United States Inernal Revenue Service (IRS), Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) and Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD).
They were milling about a shopping area parking lot after execution of an undercover narcotics operation search warrant. They saw someone walking through the parking lot looking into cars, including their task force undercover vehicles containing narcotics and money recovered from the search.
The District Attorney's Office has also declined to file charges against these officers. Deputy District Attorney John Mullen (via phone call) advised Zac's mother of their decision and was nice enough to mail a formal declination letter [insert sarcasm. sorry]. He admitted he did not know much about the case himself, as it was originally assigned to Deputy District Attorney Shelly Torrealba, who had to hand off Zac's file to someone else after she was appointed to the bench and is now Judge Shelly Torrealba.
After numerous calls to the Sheriff's department, and after speaking to a Homicide Sargeant, we've been informed a court order will be needed to obtain the official Sheriff's report on Zac's homicide. As it stands now, Zac's family has yet to see a single report from either the Sheriff's department or from the District Attorney's Office.
~~~~~~~~
Today is another day, a turning point perhaps, as we read in the Los Angeles Times:
The civilian commission that oversees the Los Angeles Police Department has taken the rare step of rejecting a recommendation from the department's chief, ruling that two police officers were wrong when they fatally shot an unarmed autistic man last year.
About midnight on March 20, Officers Allan Corrales and George Diego, who worked in an anti-gang unit, were driving in a marked patrol car along Vermont Avenue in the city's Koreatown neighborhood. Both officers told investigators they heard a loud noise — which one described as a "deep boom" — behind them, according to Beck's report on the incident.
And because of this "deep boom", an unarmed autistic man was fatally shot in the head.
More...
The shooting drew sharp criticism from Washington's family, who said the man was autistic and fearful of strangers. Civil liberties groups questioned the shooting, suggesting that the officers may have overreacted because they had not observed Washington doing anything criminal.
Based on the investigation's findings, (Police Chief Charlie) Beck found Corrales and Diego had violated department policies in how they approached and engaged Washington, but decided it was reasonable for them to believe the man had a gun and intended to shoot them.
In a unanimous decision, however, the civilian commission found differently. The panel said Corrales and Diego violated department policies that govern when an officer can use lethal force.
We are going to go out on a limb here: what we are going to suggest is that the combined efforts of Zac's family and friends, as well as those of police shooting victim Doug Zerby, raised awareness of the spate of recent law enforcement shootings of unarmed civilians, who had not broken any laws.
We are going to suggest that perhaps the Police Commission has heard us and has perhaps looked into these shootings and have taken into consideration the unimaginable pain and grief these families and communities have all suffered.
We, in our infinite desire to think the best of mankind, would like to think that had an LAPD officer discharged his or her weapon fatally against Zac, this Police Commission would have ruled similarly. In fact, we (would like to) believe they wish there was more they could have done in Zac's case.
There has now been a major shift in the dominant paradigm. It is up to us to continue making noise and being heard.
6 comments:
Out here on a limb the smart money bets say that the cover-up manager on scene after Zac was killed may have instructed both men to empty their revolvers into the vehicle after Zac was taken away.
In the remote circumstance that criminal charges would ever arise in Zac's killing, a jury would be left with the near impossible task of determining beyond any reasonable doubt which man's gun was the source of the fatal bullet.
The chances of getting Justice for Zac look rather bleak. The money influence is spread so far and deep that Justice for Zac will get blocked at every level. That ain't no joke either. Get the Feds involved? HA-HA, that is a joke.
Except, there may be a chance for justice in this case. I believe that Justice for Zac may have got lucky.
Extremely lucky. They just may have lucked out.
Here is the route which I encourage Justice for Zac to embark upon and which may be the best and the only route. And it may lead further in the direction of justice than ever before seen for this type of incident in this region in contemporary times.
Here is the winning superlotto number: Captain Eisenberg.
I may be completely mistaken. I have never met the man myself. But look at his resume. If Eisenberg isn't the most real deal station captain in LAPD, then probably there are none.
Actually, there may be two lucky charms in this bowl. The second one named Chief Beck. I am not sure - but I really want to believe that Beck is particularly focused on the reality of the corrosive influence of drug money on ethical police practices. Chief Beck has demonstrated he can take the tough steps required to insure that his people can withstand the corrupting pull exerted by drug money. Be assured, if Beck allows Captain Eisenberg to do his job - there will be enough pressure coming down even the chief will have his nerve tested.
The Sheriff has completed his investigation. He refuses to share any of it with Zac's friends. He will not discuss any details with Zac's family.The memorandum of understanding has been followed. LAPD stood aside and allowed Sheriff Baca to take control of evidence and witnesses to the killing of a resident of the City of Los Angeles perpetrated within the boundaries of the City of Los Angeles.
Maybe we are at the point in our society where the right thing no longer exists. Let's make a final attempt to check if anyone is willing to do the right thing.
Zac Champommier, 18 year old musician and recent Granada Hills High graduate and friend and family member, was gunned down June 24,2010 in Studio City in a wide open parking lot within the patrol boundaries of the Los Angeles Police Department's North Hollywood Station.
Friends and family of Zac Champommier understand some level of legal culpability must have been associated with the events surrounding his death. They feel entitled to a police investigation into the persons and events which resulted in death. We cannot proceed down any path of justice until first determining the truth.
What really happened?
Request a private meeting with North Hollywood Station Captain Eisenberg. Find out if he has any interest in beginning and carrying to conclusion a by the book investigation of this killing.
Find out what he needs from Zac's supporters in order to begin the job.
If Captain Eisenberg is on board with conducting a by the book investigation of the shooting of Zac Champommier, then a visit back to see your friends at the Los Angeles Police Commission needs to be made.
Explain the purpose of your mission: to find out what really happened and then to work towards a proper application of justice based on the truth. Consider the enormous pressures to block any real investigation that will be exerted from all corners.
An investigation into Zac's shooting requires a customized structure for insulation from the big multi-jurisdictional money trough which feels threatened by disclosure of the truth in this case.
The L.A. Police Commission should order Chief Beck to place Captain Eisenberg directly and solely in charge of an investigation completely walled off from the usual organizational channels. He will request any personnel from the within the entire department of his choosing to work on the case. Command will be instructed to accomodate any request. He will be given budget for outside resources should he feel they are needed.
Captain Eisenberg will report directly to the commission or he will report directly to Chief Beck who will report to the commission.
No one else will be included in the chain of command of this investigation. The commissioners will forbid Beck and Eisenberg and any one engaged to work the case from discussing it on-duty or off- duty. The commissioners will forbid themselves from any discussion of details outside of closed session. The commission will prohibit everyone in the department from attempting to engage the chief or the captain in any informal discussion related to the case. The commission will require the Chief and the captain and every person working the case to make a formal report of any attempts by persons inside or outside the department to discuss or refer to the case.
Don't worry that I have made it sound like a very complex investigation. I don't think it is, but it may be even deeper than i imagined. Just needs to be done properly without interference.
Getting Justice for Zac will be an even greater task than conducting a real investigation. However a real investigation should deliver to Zac's friends a clear and actionable accounting of what really happened. They can then have some solid ground to find their footing, much firmer than the unsupported snow job which Sheriff Baca has been spoon-feeding to them almost 9 months.
Zac's lawsuit has been filed. There is no statute of limitations on murder. Agent Lopresti, I look forward to seeing you on the stand. Do you think others will vouch for your actions that night? Do you think that all who witnessed your conduct will support your actions in killing an unarmed honors student, particularly when you did so from the safety of facing Zac's driver's side door? Are you going to claim that you were in fear for your life from that position? Good luck. You'll need all you can get.
Unfortunatley you are all dreamers. They will protect their own at any cost. There is no justice and those that are supposed to protect the citizens are all corrupted. And it is not all about drugs or money. It is the power they have and the expectation that they will protect their peers and themselves. If you want justice you are going to need to take the necesarry action to get it. WE ARE AT WAR PEOPLE, AND THE SOONER YOU GET IT THE BETTER. Unless you are willing to put your own lives on the line, these people will continue to get away with murder.
Post a Comment